What
Consumers Want from Sprouts Going Forward
Laurie
Girand
Advisory Board Member, S.T.O.P. --Safe Tables Our Priority
Public Meeting on Sprout Safety
Washington, DC
September 28, 2025
As
mentioned, my name is Laurie Girand. Two years ago, in the
fall of 1996, my daughter Anna almost died from complications
known as Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome or HUS as a result of a
being poisoned with E. coli O157:H7. Since Anna's illness,
I have devoted virtually all of my spare time to understanding
foodborne illness. This turned out to be useful, when this
last March, my husband picked up a severe and painful diarrheal
illness while traveling abroad. When cultured, it turned out
to be Campylobacter, a foodborne illness commonly associated
with poultry that can result in long term chronic arthritis.
As
a result of my work in this area, I joined an organization
called S.T.O.P., Safe Tables Our Priority, which consists
of victims of foodborne illness, their family and friends
who are committed to ensuring that the foodborne tragedies
they have experienced are not needlessly repeated. I am on
S.T.O.P.'s Advisory Board, and I run its produce programs.
We are here today to explain the human side of the numbers
and charts that you have been hearing about, the human cost
of outbreaks that is not typically measured, the experiences
that are lost. To epidemiologists and doctors at the CDC and
to investigators at FDA, we are numbers and percentages. But
we have faces, and I'd like to share with you some of these
experiences.
What
is HUS, anyway? Between 1 and 10 and 1 and 20 children infected
with E. coli O157:H7 develop Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
which is a blood disorder, caused by a poison put into the
bloodstream by the organism. Red blood cells are shredded,
and the number of free platelets falls, as clots form and
plug up capillaries. Contrary to what you may have read, the
kidneys are merely the first part of the body to fail, clogged
with clots and overworked trying to excrete the clots and
cell fragments. The victim becomes prone to uncontrolled bleeding
in all parts of the body. Every organ suffers damage, including
the heart, the pancreas, and the brain. Victims can suffer
strokes, blindness, coma, death. The average hospital stay
is two to four weeks with some hospitalized for months. The
autopsies of those who die describe their organs as having
been liquefied.
Here
is a face for you. This is 5 year old Haylee. One night
in June of 1996, Haylee, who was 3 at the time; Haylee's 7
year old sister, Chelsea; and Haylee's Mom all developed severe
cramps and frequent, watery diarrhea which continued day and
night. Within the next two days, the Mom improved but the
two girls got worse. On Saturday, Haylee developed some blood
in her diarrhea so her mother took her and Chelsea in to see
the doctor who was not overly concerned and sent them home.
On Sunday, they again went to see their physician and were
again sent home. That evening, the parents took the children,
who had become quite dehydrated and inconsolable, to the hospital,
and they were finally admitted for observation. It was the
parents who cautiously and intuitively suggested that perhaps
it could be an E. coli infection. Indeed, stool cultures
revealed that the children had E. coli O157:H7. Over
the next day, Chelsea improved, but the doctors grew concerned
that Haylee was developing HUS and wanted to transfer her
to another hospital. The parents were told they could not
ride with their three year old in the ambulance. Chelsea cried
as her parents and sister left on Monday, July 1st.
Haylee's
Mom slept every night at the hospital. Haylee's father left
his job to emotionally support his family and wife. At the
second hospital, Haylee stopped urinating. They tried to do
peritoneal dialysis, in which doctors cut a hole in the abdominal
cavity, insert a tube and then pour fluid in with the hope
that the wastes building up in the blood will leach into the
cavity and can be siphoned out. Note that because of severely
depleted platelets, surgery is particularly dangerous for
these patients because they may just bleed and bleed and bleed.
However, in this case, Haylee's diaphragm had holes in it
which caused the dialysis fluid to leak into her chest, so
instead they had to insert a catheter in her neck and perform
hemodialysis for three hours every other day. In this first
week at the new hospital, she had been lethargic, and she
went into shock. She was put on a ventilator. But then, because
she was little and couldn't lie still, the ventilator tube
kept hitting her windpipe and caused her windpipe to swell,
so they removed the ventilator as soon as they felt she could
breathe on her own.
Haylee
needed more nutrients than IV bags could provide. When they
went to put in a blood line for intravenous nutrients, she
vomited and inhaled her own vomit. This caused pneumonia which
proceeded to respiratory failure, from which only 60% of children
survive. She was put back on the ventilator. They inserted
tubes into her chest to drain the fluid around her lungs.
As a result of the nutritional supplements, Haylee's blood
sugar level skyrocketed, and she was put on insulin. She subsequently
became insulin dependent. Sometimes, when they thought the
parents couldn't overhear them, even the nurses were crying.
Haylee
came off of dialysis in mid-August. On August 27th, she suffered
a seizure which led the doctors to discover that she had massive
bleeding in her brain which required five hours of brain surgery.
She remained in the hospital for another month. When she returned
home on October 4th, more than three months after she was
admitted, she was blind and had to take 12 medications every
day. Gradually, with therapy, she learned to walk again, and
her vision improved. Now, two years later, she is on one medication,
has significant vision impairment, has some right side weakness
and has fine motor problems. Her kidneys are not clearing
her body of wastes at normal rates. Her mother describes Haylee
as the most wonderful, loving child you will ever meet.
Through
epidemiology, it was later learned that Haylee and her family
were poisoned by lettuce contaminated with E. coli
O157:H7. The lettuce was certified organic and shipped
to Connecticut from California.
You
need to understand that if someone you know gets a foodborne
illness, it is highly probable that he or she will be mistreated
or misdiagnosed. Antibiotics, antimotility drugs and narcotics
are all believed to hasten the probability of HUS complications
in an E. coli O157:H7 infection. Yet, these are commonly
prescribed for diarrheal illnesses in the US. As can be seen
in Haylee's case, physicians frequently do not recognize the
severity of the illness. In the Odwalla apple juice outbreak,
at least two children were turned away from emergency rooms
for this reason. In my own daughter's case, her stool was
tested only for Shigella, Campylobacter and
Salmonella because the lab decided her stool wasn't
bloody enough to be caused by E. coli O157:H7. We were
told that we were not part of a larger outbreak. Later, they
would find the E. coli O157:H7 in her stool had the
same genetic fingerprint as that found in Odwalla apple juice.
Here's
another face. This is Ann. In 1988, Ann was a 32 year
old, active mother of four, whose youngest child was 1.5 years
old. She was the healthy eater in her family, always eating
fresh fruit and vegetables and trying to convince her kids
to do the same, though they were much pickier eaters. During
this year, she had diarrhea off and on for three months and
was losing weight. Though she could still function, she never
wanted to be far away from home. When she was finally diagnosed
with Salmonella, the doctors had to be careful about
which antibiotic they prescribed because she is severely allergic
to penicillin. Indeed, for this illness, she had to have two
courses of antibiotics, because she was still testing positive
for Salmonella after the first course was completed.
After the treatments she developed a constant ache in her
right side below the rib cage. Though she had no other signs
of gall bladder disease, the physicians treating her were
convinced it was caused by Salmonella, which given
how long she had carried it, would have established itself
in the intricate network of blood vessels in the gall bladder.
Despite her fears of surgery, her gall bladder was removed
The gall bladder is responsible for producing bile and enzymes
that aid in digestion. To this day, Ann cannot digest meals
the way you and I do. For the rest of her life, if she eats
a large meal one night, such as a Thanksgiving dinner, she
will still feel full the next day because her digestive tract
does not move food along the way ours does. After the surgery,
she was hospitalized for a week with severe pain, lost significant
weight, and came home, according to her, "looking like
a cadaver". Thus, ended, what for her was a year of chronic
illness. The pain was gone. Everyone was telling her "it
must have been chicken." This was common in the late
1980's when produce had not yet been associated with fecal
contamination.
In
June of 1996, Ann is now 40 and has a fifth child who is three
years old. She's still trying to get her kids to eat healthy
foods. They've gone to the swimming pool, and she's taking
orders for sandwiches which she plans to get from a local
grocery store deli. She remembers telling her kids, "Hey
guys, don't you want something green on your sandwiches? Don't
you want a little lettuce or sprouts? Thank God, no one took
me up on it." That night, after fixing a dinner the whole
family eats, she feels a little under the weather when getting
the kids put to bed. At 2:00 a.m., she awakens with diarrhea
and terrible stomach cramps that she likens to labor pains.
She is deathly ill and has a fever of 102. By 5:00 a.m., she
has had so much diarrhea that she is hemmorhaging. Her doctor
recommends that she go to the Emergency Room, but she can't
finish talking to him because she has to go back to the bathroom.
She and her husband scramble to find someone who can watch
the kids. In the Emergency Room, they give her two bags of
IV fluids even though ten hours before she was perfectly hydrated.
They ask for a stool sample, and she remembers handing it
to them and saying "Oh, this won't work, all there is
is blood." Then, they send her home. It never occurs
to her that it might be Salmonella because the experience
is so different from that of the previous illness.
That
afternoon, they call to confirm that Ann has gotten Salmonella
again and to prescribe an antibiotic. The next night, the
evening news confirms what the county will soon determine
by matching the Salmonella in Ann's stool to that of
others. Ann is a victim of Salmonella food poisoning
from alfalfa sprouts. Sprout growers in California
are briefly shut down, and the grocery store where she bought
the sandwiches pulls them off of the shelves.
As
of today, Ann doesn't eat sprouts at all. If she orders a
salad in a restaurant, she tells them she doesn't want the
sprouts. And if they give her a salad with sprouts by mistake,
she sends the whole salad back and tells them to do it over
again.
Let
me ask if you are familiar with the disease Listeria?
As has been mentioned, there was a Listeria-related
recall of many different kinds of sprouts in the last month.
Listeria can create asymptomatic infections in pregnant
women. A woman can have a perfect pregnancy, have an amnio
with results indicating the baby is fine, appear to be perfectly
healthy, and then find, half way through her pregnancy or
even close to delivery, that her baby has died. She then has
a choice of whether to use a dilation and extraction procedure
to remove the baby's body by sucking it out through a tube
or she can experience the pain of chemically induced labor
to give birth to a body that is already dead. Babies born
with a Listeria infection can develop meningitis, a
dangerous infection of the lining of the brain. When autopsies
are performed, pathologists may not even test for Listeria,
specifically because it is considered less common. As a result,
epidemiologists largely do not investigate undiagnosed stillbirths,
and outbreaks of Listeria largely go undetected.
To
give you an idea of how far the numbers and data you've been
shown so far today get from the real individuals and their
experiences, I tried to get some very basic information about
the victims of a single alfalfa sprout outbreak. I wanted
to understand how young they were, how old they were, and
whether the outbreak might have been responsible for maiming
children, requiring gall bladders be removed, or perhaps killing
someone. In essence, I wanted to understand the breadth and
depth of the victims' experience in a sprout outbreak. I called
the CDC and the Virginia State Health Department to gather
further information on the victims of the E. coli O157:H7
outbreak associated with sprouts that occurred in the summer
of 1997 in Michigan and Virginia. I asked two simple questions:
what were the ages of all of the victims and what were their
final conditions.
The
bottom line is that this data is not easily available because
at these levels, victims continue to be numbers. Epidemiologists
study victims only so that they can identify the source of
the outbreak. They put victims of a common outbreak into two
groups: those they study and everyone else. In Virginia, the
age of each victim is trapped on a computer of someone who
has since moved to another job. Therefore, what we know about
the Virginia victims is minimal. Their ages ranged from 1
to 71 years. Of the twenty enrolled in the state's study,
90% reported bloody diarrhea. 43% required hospitalization.
Out of all of the victims, at least one girl developed Hemolytic
Uremic Syndrome.
You
might wonder why a one year old would appear to be eating
sprouts. In reality, it looks as though in both states, there
were secondary infections. For many of these illnesses, victims
can go through a phase where they are no longer symptomatic
but are still shedding organisms and can be infectious. A
secondary infection occurs, for example, when an infected
parent touches their child and thereby infects their daughter
or son. Or a secondary infection can occur when a parent sends
a child to a lake and the child swallows contaminated water
in which an infected child has defecated. So a victim did
not need to personally eat sprouts to necessarily share in
the impact of the outbreak. What this means for parents is
that there are lots of ways to give your children lifethreatening
foodborne illness, and all parents need to be vigilant.
The
CDC had the ages of the individual Michigan victims, but it
was easier to find the ages of the victims that were studied.
The rest of the ages were available but it would have taken
awhile to get find them. Their ages ranged from 4 to 79. Of
the thirty that were enrolled in a study, 97% reported bloody
diarrhea, and 53% were hospitalized. Out of all of the vicitms,
two people, age 7 and 21, developed HUS. One 64 year old developed
TTP, an adult version of HUS. That person was followed up
this last April and was in critical condition and still on
kidney dialysis. The opinion of the epidemiologist that was
in contact with the victim's family was that she could be
dead now given her condition as of April but no one had followed
up since.
Yet,
after the epidemiologists pack up their statistical software
and portable computers and publish their reports, for victims
of many of these foodborne diseases, the long term consequences
are what matter. As you've seen, a year passed before Ann
finally had her gall bladder removed. Haylee's recovery is
not complete. All HUS survivors suffer the risk of complete
kidney loss in adulthood, maybe decades later after what can
appear to be a "complete" recovery. They can also
develop gallstones, diabetes, colon and intestinal problems,
and heart problems. So the information you get from epidemiologists
today, these figures that describe all the victims as recovered,
are highly misleading. The epidemiologists give you only a
snapshot of one moment in time, perhaps even before subsequent
severe cases are identified.
So
given all that we don't know, what do we know? We know that
sprouts are only healthy for you if they don't make you deathly
ill. We know that in all likelihood, the cases detected by
epidemiologists represent a fraction of the total people infected
or sickened. Think about how sick you have to be with a diarrheal
illness before you go to see a doctor, and you get the idea.
We also know that the outbreaks identified are a fraction
of those that are actually caused. We know it takes fewer
than ten organisms, perhaps as little as a single organism
of E. coli O157:H7 to cause deadly illness. Think about
that the next time you shake hands with someone, the next
time you use a public toilet seat, or the next time you go
swimming and get water in your nose. We know the FDA and California
State Department of Health have issued press releases advising
at-risk groups to not consume alfalfa sprouts. We also know
that there are members of the sprout industry who are legitimately
concerned and are trying to take steps to improve the situation.
But
this is not enough.
May
I ask how many of you are parents? Thank you. And how many
of you are children? We live in a society of warnings which
we choose to read or disregard at will. There are warnings
about inhaling gasoline fumes at gas pumps. There are warnings
about putting a child in a seat with an airbag and how to
secure a child's carseat. There are warnings about
the effects of alcohol on a fetus. There are warnings
about the side effects of medicines. There are warnings
about riding bicycles with helmets. There are safehandling
labels on meats. And, obviously, there are warnings on
poisons. As a parent, I take each and every one of
these into account when I look at my child's longterm health
consequences. Yet, the single greatest crisis in my family's
life was the one for which I received absolutely no warning.
That unpasteurized juice could harbor organisms that would
try to kill my daughter. My mother consumed the same juice,
and it is by the grace of God that I did not lose both my
mother and daughter in the fall of 1996.
You,
as parents, can understand that I was distraught when I learned
that the FDA and the CDC had known for years that unpasteurized
juices were making people sick. Their response through that
time: fund more research and tell industry to do some cleanup.
In doing so, they robbed me of my right to protect my family
by refusing to share with me what they knew: that more outbreaks
were likely to occur. They also sentenced my daughter to a
lifetime of health uncertainty.
S.T.O.P.
is united in its efforts to ensure that consumers will not
be repeatedly misled into believing that a food is
healthier when it can cause potentially deadly illness in
a matter of hours or days. We support the FDA and State of
California's press releases warning at-risk consumers against
consuming alfalfa sprouts until they are deemed safe. We expect
the FDA to add pregnant women to the list of at-risk groups
as the recent evidence of Listeria has shown they are
at-risk. Press releases are good, but we must do better. Information
must be placed where at-risk consumers will encounter it in
order for them to be able to execute informed choices about
their risks. Until sprouts can be made safely, e are asking
FDA to introduce an expedited ruling to place warning
labels on sprouts, whether packaged, sold in bulk
or as part of prepared foods through delis or restaurants.
We are asking that FDA meet with the American Academy of Pediatrics
to ensure that parents are warned through their pediatricians
that until further measures are taken, alfalfa sprouts represent
a serious risk. We, and we believe you, do not want naive
parents throwing alfalfa sprouts into a salad for a school
potluck.
S.T.O.P.'s
position on any produce that is served ready-to-eat is that
there must be a zero tolerance for an infectious dose level
of pathogens. As a result, we cannot be supportive of efforts
that merely reduce organisms such as O157:H7 down to a single
bacterium only to encourage it to grow back again 10,000 or
100,000 times. The suggestion that consumers or industry can
achieve safe produce by rinsing off pathogens with water defies
both scientific evidence and reason when addressing highly
infectious pathogens.
We
understand that the evidence of sprout contamination points
to the seed itself. It is largely recognized that if the seed
cannot be made safe, sprouts cannot be made safely. If, after
the conclusion of this meeting, there is a consensus that
there is a technology that would result in a dramatic reduction
of organisms, preferably a complete elimination of them, we
would advocate that it be required of all companies immediately.
If a technology superior to this consensus becomes available,
we will support FDA moving quickly to implement it.
We
applaud the efforts of the sprout industry to introduce sanitary
procedures, but we cannot support self-policing alone. All
industries have low quality producers, and this industry is
no exception. The slides from California's investigations
show rusty ceilings dripping into sprout beds; rodent feces
on the ground near seed; dirty bins being stacked on top of
open seed containers. To imagine that all producers will comply
with voluntary anything is to waste valuable time and continue
to jeopardize consumer safety and, to be frank, industry economics.
The sprout industry was given warnings and guidance by FDA
years ago, yet outbreaks continue to be caused by producers.
In
addition to pathogen-free seed, the FDA must impose mandatory
HACCP on sprout suppliers as soon as pathogen-free seed is
available, and not in two years or three years. We must have
end product testing to ensure consumer confidence in this
product. The Western Growers Association and United Fresh
Fruit and Vegetables Association should insist that these
steps be taken to ensure safe sprouts; without these steps,
outbreaks are likely to continue. Multiple, continuing outbreaks
from sprouts, a supposedly healthy product, will have a deleterious
effect on the markets for other fresh produce, especially
if other vegetables are mistakenly associated with sprout-caused
disease because they are found in salads with sprouts.
Lastly,
S.T.O.P. will be asking for mandatory traceback data which
would address both seed lots and sprout batches and lots so
to assist investigators in quickly identifying contamianted
sprouts in order to pull them off of shelves and thus reducing
the impact of an outbreak that is underway.
Let
me suggest that this path might sound hard, but if pathogen-free
seed can be achieved, and if the industry executes these steps
quickly (interim labeling, mandatory HACCP, traceback), it
is quite possible that sprouts could achieve a market position
that other forms of produce cannot achieve. Not only could
sprouts be healthy for the average consumer but because they
can be grown with pathogen-free water and without soil, manure
or other accidental animal involvement, they have the potential
to be one of the safest forms of produce on the market.
S.T.O.P.
believes that we are all in agreement that we need to move
forward quickly. However, we are concerned that exactly
- how
quickly,
- whether
we will apply regulations uniformly to all sprout growers,
and
- whether
we will inform consumers
may
be questions you are still debating. We ask only that government
and industry consider the obvious: we should not wait so long
to institute precautions and warnings that more people die
when we all knew such a tragedy could happen. Let us all commit
ourselves to no more illnesses or injuries from sprouts, starting
today.
Thank
you very much.
|