California's Food Safety Needs
Laurie Girand
California Food Safety Task Force Workshop
Sacramento, CA
August 1, 2025
Good
afternoon.
My
name is Laurie Girand, and I grew up, here, in California.
Prior to 1996, the only feature of food that concerned me
was how fresh or processed a food was; no one told me about
bulging cans, raw fish or oysters, ground meat, undercooked
eggs or unpasteurized juice. Then, in October 1996, (SLIDE)
I was made painfully aware of hazards of food when my own
daughter nearly died. I received a bedside education about
bacteria that put a toxin into the bloodstream and shred a
child's organs from the inside. I learned that other children,
besides my daughter suffered as well. We were part of the
Odwalla outbreak, which was identified in Washington, not
California, and over half the victims were five years old
and under. And I learned what many of you already knew: that
a great deal of foodborne disease is preventable, that my
own daughter's illness might have been completely preventable,
that she didn't need to face a lifetime of adverse health.
Because
of our family's experience, I jointed S.T.O.P. - Safe Tables
Our Priority, a national, grassroots nonprofit of victims
of foodborne illness, their family, friends and other concerned
about the immediate threat to the public health by pathogens
in foods. I am the Produce Programs Manager and a Board Member.
My work for S.T.O.P. is strictly as an unpaid volunteer.
(SLIDE)
S.T.O.P.
has one mission: to prevent unnecessary illness, suffering,
injury and death from foodborne illness. We believe California
is beset with many challenges, which if treated with the urgency
they deserve could prevent many lifethreatening illnesses
and deaths in years to come.
From
a consumer perspective, here are some of California's food
safety needs:
1)
We here today need to agree that we share a common enemy:
pathogenic organisms that must be recognized as biohazards.
This enemy takes advantage of delay or inaction, ignorance,
sloppiness, negligence and occasionally fraud to harm and
kill people, particularly the most vulnerable members of
our society. In a laboratory, no one is allowed to handle
these biohazards without training and proper precautions.
Yet, on a farm, one can legally apply raw manure, even human
waste, to fresh produce in the state of California. At S.T.O.P.,
I most often work with foods that are eaten uncooked such
as lettuce, berries, sprouts and melon. Government recommendations
to the contrary, science has shown that consumers cannot
defend themselves from these biohazards by merely rinsing
the excrement off of their fresh fruits and vegetables.
It is therefore imperative that biohazards be stopped on
the farm and at distribution points before they arrive in
our homes. Being at the end of the farm-to-fork continuum,
consumers can only be reactive, not proactive. Suggesting
consumers should be held responsible for defending themselves
against foodborne illness is like suggesting people should
be held responsible for getting malaria because they don't
adequately swat mosquitos when they land.
In
acknowledging our common enemy, the Food Safety Task Force
must recognize animal and human waste for what it really
is: hazardous waste. In California, we have companies that
want to irrigate human food crops with untreated human wastewater.
We have companies that want to pump untreated wastewater
underground and somehow imagine that the water will be magically
transformed into drinking water by filtration through soil
. In California, we have largely unregulated animal waste
products left in mounds and lagoons all around the state.
These are food and water contamination disasters waiting
to happen as they did in Walkerton, Ontario this summer,
as they did at the Albany, NY state fair last summer, as
they did all over eastern North Carolina last summer. We
can no longer ignore that human and animal waste is a byproduct
that threatens our food and water, our environment, and
the public's health and has a very real, human cost to the
public.
2)
We here today need to recognize that the single most powerful
weapon we have in fighting these biohazards is accountability.
All the industry education in the world is useless if we
cannot identify who is growing, processing and distributing
a specific food. Californians need mandatory registration
of all participants growing, processing and distributing
food. Just as laboratories and physicians must be trained
in precautions before handling biohazards, all food producers,
sellers and resellers should be educated about the dangers
of pathogens. Californians need traceback and farm-of-origin
mechanisms so that growers will know they are accountable.
Californians also need information about taxpayer-financed
government inspections to be made publicly available. In
turn, we must reward businesses that consistently produce
pathogen free and reduced products by encouraging them to
market their products as superior. Without accountability
along the food safety continuum, there is little incentive
to change, and we cannot ensure that the weakest links in
the chain will be strengthened or replaced. With
accountability, consumers can make informed choices. And
you can bet that however much a farmer wants to sell sheep
from a flock exhibiting signs of BSE infection, there'd
never be a market for the product if consumers could link
the food to that farm.
3)
We need to empower consumers to defend themselves as best
they can. Consumers, particularly those most at-risk, must
be given full and equal access to the food safety information
known by government and industry. Real consumer education
would focus on at-risk groups instead of using out-dated
distribution channels that were established to teach people
interested in learning about cooking, not food safety. Real
consumer education would focus on parents, not children.
Real consumer food safety education would accurately describe
the grave consequences of foodborne illness, not gloss them
over with costumed characters. Real consumer food safety
education would state cearly that the only thing consumers
can do to save their families is cooking their food, that
merely rinsing with water is insufficient. Real consumer
education would recognize the inherent conflict between
a government pushing fresh fruit and vegetables for nutritional
purposes and a government that should tell us that fresh
fruit and vegetables, if contaminated, can kill more quickly
than any pesticide. If government were interested in real
consumer education, it would find a way to reach consumers
to notify them about outbreaks and recalls instead of just
issuing press releases.
4)
We need regulators to collect complete, accurate data on
who is getting sick from what, and it must be made publicly
available. We need follow up data to ensure we are measuring
the full cost to people's health. Surveillance data that
doesn't measure Salmonella enteritidis where it is most
often found, namely in Southern California, is nothing more
than a shell game. We need mandatory illness reporting across
all counties in the state, networked and computerized. We
need state financed stool testing for all children with
diarrheal illness. But we also need to ensure that claims
of insufficient data, science and risk assessment are not
used as delay and diversion tactics. While S.T.O.P. supports
science-based food safety, we are opposed to the sacrifice
of common sense on the altar of science. Risk assessment
should accurately reflect the increasing risks across all
foods and the increasing health costs of those who suffer
and compare them with the level of risk thirty years ago.
5)
We need to revolutionize California's outdated and uncoordinated
food safety systems. The present separation of restaurant
food regulation from on-farm and processing food safety
is a senseless division of oversight, originating from arcane
rulings about authority. Juices labeled with warnings in
bottles are served without warnings in glasses. Hamburger
sold with warnings in grocery stores is served rare without
so much as a bat of the eye by a waiter. Counties inspect
this, state inspects that, federal inspects the other. Food
safety practices must be uniformly applied and coordinated
from farm to fork.
6)
By victim's standards, we do not perceive California to
be a leader, but we need California to become a leader
in food safety. While California's directives about food
safety seek to eliminate resource duplication and waste,
there is none that says that California must wait to have
inferior and unevenly applied food safety rules dictated
to it by federal government. Today, California creates guidance
and then waits for the federal government to create real
regulations. Labeling that could protect consumers languishes
while awaiting FDA's stamp of approval. The most progressive
legislation in food safety in this state in the last decade,
restaurant temperature requirements, was pushed by consumers,
not regulators. Every person working on food safety should
be required to visit a child dying from E. coli O157:H7,
listen to their cries, so that they can understand we don't
have time for delay tactics, turf wars, empire building
and passing the buck.
Lastly,
as consumers, we insist that California food safety be funded
by government, not by industry. Industry pays for activities
and research that meet industry's priorities. Industry funds
a significant portion of academia. We are here on an urgent
matter of great importance for the public's health, not industry's
health. Food safety must serve the public first.
In
these meetings, we are taking an important first step toward
improving the health of California's families and of the next
generation. To truly win the war against these biohazards,
we will certainly have to think "outside the box,"
and we may have to sacrifice some sacred cows. I challenge
you to invent new systems that will work better than the old
ones. As we go forward, I want you to assure you that any
one person in this room today, YOU, CAN make a difference
in food safety. Tomorrow, when you look in the mirror before
you come to this meeting, don't ask yourself whether you can
save a life with the work you are doing, but rather how many
lives you can save.
Thank
you very much.
|